logo
Call Us: 610- 370-6682
            570- 794-5017
lawyer@lieverhymanpotter.com
  • Home
  • How it Works
  • Experience
  • Awards & Settlements
  • Auto Accident FAQs
  • Practice Areas
  • Blog
  • Contact Us
← Older posts

NEW PENNSYLVANIA LAW TO PROTECT STUDENT ATHLETES FROM SERIOUS HEAD INJURIES

Posted on January 10, 2012 by admin

A head injury can be devastating, and its effects, life changing.  The lawyers at Liever, Hyman & Potter, P.C., in Reading, PA know that first hand, and have handled many cases in which clients have been involved in workplace, automobile, or other accidents resulting in a serious head injury.

On November 9, 2011, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett recently signed the “Safety in Youth Sports Act,’’ a law intended to prevent serious head injuries in student athletes and strengthen education about the risks of concussions. “Some will call this erring on the side of caution,’’ Corbett said. “To that I say, you bet.”  When it has to do with our young people, with their health and safety, we should take no needless chances.’’

The measure, Senate Bill 200, establishes standards for managing concussions and other brain injuries. It requires student athletes who may have suffered a head injury to be removed from the activity and not allow them to return to play until they have been medically cleared. In addition, it requires coaches to be trained annually, and establishes penalties for those who don’t comply. “Our hope is that this bill will reduce the risk of long-term damage for student athletes who suffer concussions or other brain-related trauma while participating in sports. By signing this bill, Pennsylvania joins 31 other states in establishing legislation,’’ Corbett said.

The law also requires the Departments of Health and Education to post guidelines and other relevant materials online to inform and educate students participating in any athletic activity, their parents and their coaches about the nature and risk of concussions and traumatic brain injury.

The law takes effect next July 1. (Source: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of the Governor, News Release, November 14, 2011).

It is important to contact an experienced injury lawyer if you have sustained head injury at work or as the result of the negligence or carelessness of someone else.  The lawyers at Liever, Hyman & Potter, P.C. have handled many head injury cases in Reading, Pottsville and throughout Pennsylvania successfully.

Posted in Legal News, Personal Injury | Tagged Berks County attorney, Personal Injury Lawyer Reading | Comments Off

ATTENTION ALL DRIVERS: PENNDOT’S WINTER DRIVING TIPS

Posted on January 3, 2012 by Andrew F. Fick

Winter is here, and taking a few simple steps can help you avoid becoming stranded on Pennsylvania’s roadways or, worse, being involved in an accident.  The lawyers at Liever, Hyman & Potter, P.C. in Reading, PA want to share these winter driving tips with you.

Always wear your seat belt, drive at a reduced speed, and always drive defensively.

Always turn on your headlights during inclement weather. State law requires drivers to turn on their headlights when wipers are on.

Give yourself plenty of time to get to where you are going during the winter.

Keep your gas tank full.

Maintain at least twice the normal following distance when driving on snow or ice.

Rear-end collisions account for most winter crashes.

Keep your vehicle in proper working condition. Make sure the engine is tuned and the battery, belts, hoses and radiator are checked. Examine your tires to make sure they have adequate tread. Also, remember to keep your tires properly inflated.

Periodically check the level of your windshield washing fluid and only use fluids containing an anti-freeze solvent. Keep an extra container of windshield fluid in the trunk.

Remove snow and ice from the hood and roof of your vehicle. State law states that if snow or ice from your vehicle strikes another vehicle or person and causes death or injury, you will face a severe fine.

Remove snow and ice from your windows, mirrors, hood, headlights, taillights, and trunk before driving.

Keep in your vehicle during the winter: an ice scraper/snow brush, de-icer, small snow shovel, warning devices (flares or triangles), bag of salt or sand, flashlight, battery cables, tire chains, paper towels, and a blanket.

Maintain a distance of at least six car lengths behind a snow plow.

Do not pass a snow plow because the plow blades are wider than the truck.

Car pool or use mass transit whenever possible during the winter. Fewer cars on the road make travel safer during a snowstorm and expedite snow plowing operations.

Use extra care when driving on a bridge or elevated ramp during the winter because they freeze before roads do.

Don’t drink and drive. Alcohol and icy roads can be a deadly combination.

(Source: PennDOT 2009-2010 Winter Maintenance Guide).

If you are involved in an accident in which you, or a family member, are injured by the negligence or carelessness of another person, you should talk to a lawyer about your rights.  The lawyers at Liever, Hyman & Potter, P.C. have been helping injured people in Reading, Pottsville and throughout Pennsylvania obtain fair compensation for their injuries caused by auto accidents for over 50 years.

By Andrew F. Fick, Esquire

Posted in Auto Accident Lawyer, Personal Injury | Tagged Auto Accident Attorneys Pennsylvania, Auto Accidents Lawyer, Personal Injury Lawyer Reading | Comments Off

PENNSYLVANIA’S STRONGER TEEN DRIVER LAW TO TAKE EFFECT DECEMBER 27TH

Posted on December 21, 2011 by Andrew F. Fick

Inexperienced drivers can be a danger on the roadway. The lawyers at Liever, Hyman & Potter, P.C., in Reading, PA have handled many cases in which inexperienced drivers, unfortunately, have caused car accidents resulting in serious injuries.

In Pennsylvania, a new law (Act 81 of 2011) aimed at increasing safety for young drivers takes effect at 12:01 a.m. on Dec. 27th. The new law increases behind-the-wheel training requirements, places a limit on the number of passengers a young driver can transport and makes not wearing a seatbelt a primary offense for young drivers.

The new law adds 15 hours of supervised, behind-the-wheel training for driver’s license permit holders younger than 18, bringing the total to 65 hours. Ten of the additional hours must include driving at night and five hours must occur during poor weather conditions.  Current permit-holders younger than 18 who have not yet passed the driving skills test before Dec. 27 will have to meet the requirements of the new law.

Also, as part of the law, drivers younger than 18 will not be permitted to transport more than one passenger who is under 18 and is not an immediate family member unless they are accompanied by a parent or legal guardian. After six months, the junior driver may transport up to three passengers younger than 18 who are not immediate family members without a parent or legal guardian present, but only if that driver has not been convicted of a driving violation or has not been partially or fully responsible for a reportable crash.

The law also requires that junior drivers and passengers under the age of 18 must wear a seat belt, and children under the age of eight must be fastened in a child restraint system. The seat belt provisions of the new law are primary offenses, meaning a driver can be stopped and cited solely for that violation.

More information on the changes for teen drivers can be found at http://www.dmv.state.pa.us/ by clicking on the “New Teen Driver Law 2011″ button.

(Source: Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Transportation, News Release, December 19, 2011, As Revised.)

It is important to consult with an experienced personal injury lawyer if you, or a family member, are injured in a car accident caused by the careless or negligence of someone else.  The lawyers at Liever, Hyman & Potter, P.C. have handled many car accident cases in the Reading, PA and Pottsville, PA areas successfully.

By Andrew F. Fick, Esquire

 

Posted in Auto Accident Lawyer, Personal Injury | Tagged Auto Accident Attorneys Pennsylvania, Auto Accidents Lawyer, Berks County attorney, Personal Injury Lawyer Reading | Leave a comment

PENNSYLVANIA GOVERNOR SIGNS LAW MAKING TEXTING WHILE DRIVING ILLEGAL

Posted on December 9, 2011 by Andrew F. Fick

Distracted driving is dangerous. The lawyers at Liever, Hyman & Potter, P.C., located in Reading, PA have handled many cases in which distracted driving resulted in accidents causing serious injury.

On November 9, 2011, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Corbett signed legislation that banned texting while driving on Pennsylvania roads. The new law, which makes texting while driving a primary offense carrying a $50 fine, takes effect 120 calendar days from the date it was signed.

The new law specifically does the following:

1. Prohibits as a primary offense all drivers from using an Interactive Wireless Communication Device (IWCD) to send, read, or write a text-based message.

2. Defines an IWCD as a wireless phone, personal digital assistant, smart phone, portable or mobile computer or similar devices that can be used for texting, instant messaging, emailing, or browsing the Internet.

3. Defines a text-based message as a text message, instant message, email, or other written communication composed or received on an IWCD.

4. Institutes a $50 fine for convictions under this section.

5. Makes clear that this law supersedes and preempts any local ordinances restricting the use of interactive wireless devices by drivers.

In 2010, there were almost 14,000 crashes in Pennsylvania where distracted driving played a role, with nearly 1,100 of those crashes involving a handheld cellular phone.  (Source:  Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Office of the Governor, News Release, November 9, 2011).

It is best to engage an experienced injury lawyer to help you pursue claims for damages arising out of an automobile accident.  The lawyers at Liever, Hyman & Potter, P.C. have handled many automobile accident cases in the Reading and Pottsville areas successfully.

Posted in Auto Accident Lawyer, In the News, Legal News | Tagged Auto Accident Attorneys Pennsylvania, Auto Accidents Lawyer, Berks County attorney | Comments Off

PA Supreme Court Strikes Down Workers’ Compensation Exclusion in Insurance Policy

Posted on November 9, 2011 by admin

From the Desk of Adam K. Levin, Esq. (PA workers’ comp and personal injury attorney). Since it violates public policy, workers’ compensation exclusion in employer-sponsored insurance policy is unenforceable. Heller v. League of Cities (PICS Case No. 11-4354)(Pa. Oct. 19, … Continue reading →

More Galleries | Comments Off

Federal Trade Commission Issues Consumer Alert Regarding Indoor Tanning

Posted on October 4, 2011 by admin

Ads for tanning salons, sun lamps and tanning beds promise a bronzed body year-round, but experts agree that ultraviolet (UV) radiation from these devises damages the skin and poses serious health risks.  Sunburns and tans are signs of skin damage.  Deliberate tanning, either indoors or out, increases your risk of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer.

The FTC has charged the Indoor Tanning Association with making false health and safety claims about indoor tanning.  According to the FTC complaint, contrary to claims in the association’s advertising, indoor tanning increases the risk of squamous cell and melanoma skin cancers.  The association has now agreed to a settlement that bars it from any further deception

The lawyers at Liever, Hyman & Potter, P.C., are concerned about deceptive business practices and the protection of consumers and represent individuals in cancer lawsuits.

By:  Adam K. Levin, Esquire

Posted in Defective Products, Personal Injury | Comments Off

U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission and Target Issue Recall of Step Stools

Posted on September 29, 2011 by admin

The CPSC, in cooperation with Target Corporation, announced a voluntary recall of 341,000 wooden step stools with storage.  The step stools can break apart or collapse under the weight of the user, posing a fall hazard.

Target has received 27 reports of the stools breaking or collapsing. Fourteen incidents involved children, eight involved adults, and five incidents where the user’s age was unknown. Two adults fractured their wrists, and of those victims, one also fractured her hip and pelvis. Additionally, six children and one adult suffered scrapes and bruising.

The wooden step stool has two steps and comes in various colors.  The step stools were sold exclusively at Target and were manufactured by either Circo company or The Do Your Room company.

According to the CPSC, consumers should immediately stop using the step stools and return them to any Target store to receive a full refund.

The attorneys at Liever, Hyman & Potter, P.C., are experienced products liability litigators and represent people who have been injured by defective products

Posted in Defective Products | Comments Off

MYTHS ON MEDICAL MALPRACTICE LITIGATION DEBUNKED

Posted on August 31, 2011 by admin

Excerpted  From the Pennsylvania Association for Justice, 08.19.11

Introduction. The statistics from our Supreme Court show that there is no medical malpractice crisis. Rather than taking away the rights of victims of negligence in the name of “lawsuit reform,” our Legislature should be concerned with patient safety, which continues to be an epidemic. A study published this year in the journal, Health Affairs, reports one in three hospital patients suffers a preventable medical error, such as an infection, wrong medication or surgical mistake.

1. Myth: Lawsuits Are Out of Control.

Truth: In 2010, there were 1,491 filings, a 45.4 percent decline from the “base years” 2000-2002. In

Philadelphia, the state’s largest judicial district, the decline has been nearly 70 percent during the same

period. 1 In the last 12 months, there were 1,797,869 discharged from Pennsylvania’s hospitals. 2

2. Myth: Lawsuits Cause “Defensive Medicine.”

Truth: (1) The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found evidence of so-called “defensive

medicine” only in Medicare programs, not in private managed care programs. Private managed care

programs “limit the use of services that have marginal or no effect on patients” whereas Medicare does

not.  3 Bad management causes “defensive medicine,” not lawsuits. See also The Real Story on Defensive

Imaging, available to Members on the PAJ website. (2) A 2010 Dartmouth nationwide study found that

a substantial number of cardiologists said they would perform “non-clinical” procedures, not because

of fear of lawsuits, but because “they believed a colleague would do so in the same situation” and/or

“because of the added income they could earn by performing the procedure.” 4

3. Myth: PA Has Not Acted to Halt Insubstantial Med Mal Lawsuits.

Truth: In 2003, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court promulgated rules that require (1) an attorney

representing a plaintiff to obtain a certificate from an independent doctor who says that the case holds

genuine merit, and (2) that a lawsuit can only brought in the county where the medical care was

rendered. 5 PA Supreme Court Chief Justice Ronald D. Castille: “Pennsylvania’s Judiciary collaboratively

addressed a complex medical malpractice litigation crisis, and the latest figures show the progress

made in the last seven years. One of our fundamental priorities is to assure the Commonwealth’s

citizens that the legal process will not be abused in malpractice cases. We’re very encouraged by these

statistics. The crisis is over.” [emphasis added] 6

1 See Latest Medical Malpractice Data Shows Number of Filings Reach New Low, Administrative Office of PA Courts, May 18, 2011.

2 See Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council’s Inpatient County Profiles, Statewide Counts, 2009 Q4 – 2010 Q3.

3 See Letter from Douglas W. Elmendorf, Director of the Congressional Budget Office to the Hon. Orrin Hatch, October 9, 2009.

4 See The Dartmouth, Study: Regional trends found in cardiology test, May 3, 2010.

5 See Pa Supreme Court Rules in Professional Liability Actions, Rules 1042.3 and 1006, Administrative Office of Pennsylvania Courts,

January 7, 2003.

6 See Latest Medical Malpractice Data Shows Number of Filings Reach New Low, Administrative Office of PA Courts, May 18, 2011.

4. Myth: Physicians Are Fleeing Pennsylvania.

Truth: According to the American Medical Association, the number of physicians in Pennsylvania has

risen from 36,603 in 2000 to 44,336 in 2009. In those same years, the number of physicians per

100,000 people in Pennsylvania has remained steady from 295 to 317. 7

5. Myth: Costly Medical Liability Insurance is Attributable to Lawsuits.

Truth: As the number of medical malpractice lawsuit filings has declined sharply, Pennsylvania

insurance carriers have nonetheless increased their earnings from medical liability insurance premiums.

In 2002, the amount of insurance premiums they earned was $458,131. In 2009, the amount they

earned was $721,729, which is almost double. 8 Notably, during this same time period insurance

companies have reduced their payouts from $510,741 in 2002 to $326,153 in 2009, a 38% drop. 9 A

national study released 8/18/11 by the New England Journal of Medicine found that most claims

submitted by patients are dropped without payment.10 This confirms what we have known in

Pennsylvania for some time: Insurance companies continue to gouge doctors with ever-increasing

premiums even as they take in record profits and reduce payouts.

6. Myth: Enacting “Tort Reform” laws would reduce health care costs greatly.

Truth: The Congressional Budget Office found that if every possible “tort reform” were enacted

across the United States, the savings realized would amount to a savings of only 2 percent of total

health care expenditures. Even then, were such draconian measures adopted, the nation’s mortality

rate would increase by .02 percent. 11 That’s almost 5,000 preventable deaths per year.

Patient Safety is the Real Issue.

Medical errors kill more people every year in the United States than breast cancer, prostate cancer,

drunk driving combined.

Medical Errors 98,000 12

Breast Cancer 40,230 13

Prostate Cancer 32,050 14

Drunk Driving 10,839 15

Total: 83,119

7 See Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the U.S., Various Editions, American Medical Association.

8 See Annual Statistical Report of the Insurance Department of the Commonwealth of PA (“Commissioners Reports”), 2002-2010. (Page

667 in 2010 Report.)

9 See Annual Statistical Report of the Insurance Department of the Commonwealth of PA (“Commissioners Reports”), 2002-2010. (Page

667 in 2010 Report.)

10 See Malpractice Risk According to Physician Specialty, New England Journal of Medicine, August 18, 2011.

11 See Letter from Douglas W. Elmendorf, Director, Congressional Budget Office, to Hon. Orrin Hatch, October 9, 2009.

12 See U.S. Institute of Medicine, To Err is Human, 2000

13 See American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts & Figures 2010, p. 6.

14 See American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts & Figures 2010, p. 6.

15 See National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Traffic Safety Facts, 2009 Data,

The above article was provided from the desk of John R. Badal. President of the law firm of Liever, Hyman & Potter, Reading, PA . We have been representing clients successfully since 1959. Our clients are primarily from Berks and Schuylkill Counties and have been the victims of Medical Malpractice, Nursing Home neglect, car, motorcycle and truck accidents, work injuries and product defects.

Posted in Medical Malpractice | Comments Off

Tort respect needed, not tort reform

Posted on August 23, 2011 by admin

(Aug. 19, 2011) Almost everyone has heard of the hot coffee case, but who remembers Stella Liebeck? A generation has grown up not knowing that it was Stella, a plucky 79-year-old woman from Albuquerque, New Mexico, who took on McDonald’s in a much publicized civil case in 1994.

“Hot Coffee,” a new documentary showing on HBO, retells Stella’s lost story (Liebeck died in 2004), and the stories of plaintiffs in three other important civil cases. The subjects present the human cost to the rights we are losing to caps on damages, pervasive use of binding clauses in consumer contracts, and corporate influence and control in the outcomes of judicial campaigns. The film is winning awards as it helps change attitudes about our civil justice system.

Taking Action: See how you can help spread the message about “Hot Coffee”

This summer our staff in Philadelphia got to see what the buzz is about. [A note of thanks to Xenia Hewka Scott, our Membership Director, for arranging the presentation, and to Asia Randolph, Development Assistant, who has HBO on demand.] The film stirred up healthy dialogue among our staff. Similar conversations are taking place all around the country.

Director Susan Saladoff, herself a trial lawyer, begins the documentary with the McDonald’s case and attempts to break down the damaging myths about so-called “jackpot justice” that we are still battling almost 20 years later. Today, trial attorneys, but few others, can recite these facts:

·       The very hot coffee that spilled caused third degree burns on Liebeck’s thigh, buttocks and groin;

·       Liebeck was hospitalized for eight days and endured painful skin grafts;

·       At trial, it was learned that McDonald’s forced its franchises to sells its coffee at 180 to 190 degrees Fahrenheit, and that it had known about the risk of serious burns from its coffee for more than 10 years.

No one recalls that Liebeck sought to settle only for her actual and anticipated expenses; McDonald’s offered $800. Instead, people remember the distortions, jokes and propaganda successfully spun by powerful corporate special interests and repeated over and over. Liebeck became a poster child for the American Tort Reform Association (ATRA), who twisted and spun her story to push their anti-civil justice agenda and vilify trial lawyers.

Director Saladoff effectively weaves in “man on the street” segments that show what most people know or don’t know about the McDonald’s case. They are the first ones to see the shocking pictures of Liebeck’s injuries, and then we see them. These startling photos help erase the misperceptions.

“Hard Cap”
The film next tells the story of Lisa and Mike Gourley, a Nebraska couple, whose son Colin was born in 1993 with cerebral palsy. According to the film, a jury determined that the birth injury was the result of medical negligence and awarded the family $5.6 million to pay for Colin’s lifetime of medical care. But the Nebraska Legislature had enacted a total cap on all damage awards. This reduced the award to $1.25 million, leaving the family struggling to pay for Colin’s medical bills and care. The severity of this cap hits home in Pennsylvania, where consumers may be facing a similar challenge.

The story of Oliver Diaz, a former Mississippi Supreme Court Justice, is almost too astounding to be true, but it is. In running for re-election, Diaz went up against Karl Rove and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce in a national strategy to unseat state appellate judges. Diaz was outspent, but won re-election. However, according to the film, big business had him prosecuted on false charges. Diaz was subsequently found not guilty but did not regain his seat on the bench. His story is behind the fictional account in John Grisham’s The Appeal.

Finally, the pitfalls of mandatory arbitration contracts found in everything from credit cards to cell phones to employment contracts are brought home in the story of Jamie Leigh Jones. Jones alleged she was raped by co-workers when working in Iraq as a private contractor for KBR/Halliburton. When criminal charges could not be filed, she sought to hold Halliburton accountable for their misconduct, but a forced arbitration clause buried in her employment agreement meant she lost her right to a jury trial. Jones finally got her day in court. In July, after a month-long trial, jurors in a federal courtroom acquitted Halliburton of the charges. The jury also rejected Jones’ claims that the former Halliburton subsidiary committed fraud by “inducing her to enter into an employment contract.”

Director Saladoff does an excellent job of showing the struggles her subjects face. Undoing the damage done to our civil justice system is a challenge she meets head on. In the film, an Alabama judge sums up the frustrations of trial lawyers and anyone else who cares about the rule of law: “What we need is tort respect, not tort reform.”

Reprinted from PENNSYLVANIA ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE ENews for the week of August 22, 2011. From the desk of John Badal, President of the Reading, PA law firm of Liever , Hyman & Potter serving the seriously injured in Berks and Schuylkill Counties for more than 50 years in the areas of medical malpractice, auto, truck and motorcycle accidents, work injuries , nursing neglect and product defects.

Posted in Personal Injury | Comments Off

When seeking to suspend a Claimant’s PA work comp benefits…

Posted on June 29, 2011 by admin

From the Desk of Adam K. Levin, Esq. (PA workers’ comp attorney)

When seeking to suspend a Claimant’s PA work comp benefits, an employer is not entitled to rely on the employee’s failure to seek work to prove a voluntary retirement from the workforce unless the employer proves thatthe injured worker voluntarily retired.

Keene v. W.C.A.B. (Ogden Corp.), 2011 Pa. Commw. LEXIS 233

The Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court ruled that the PA Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) erred in concluding that a claimant’s failure to look for work during a two-year period establishes claimant voluntarily removed herself from the workforce.  The Commonwealth Court further ruled that an injured worker has no duty to show she sought work until the employer meets the initial burden to a voluntary retirement.

In the Keene case, while operating an airport passenger shuttle, the employee slipped on the shuttle step and injured her knee. She underwent surgery, reached maximum medical improvement, and was able to perform only full-time sedentary work. Despite engaging in a job search for suitable work and applying for multiple positions, the employee was not hired. Thereafter, the employer filed its suspension petition, alleging that the employee had voluntarily removed herself from the work force. The Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) accepted the employee’s testimony that she had been actively seeking employment, and the WCJ determined that she had not voluntarily removed herself from the work force. Accordingly, the suspension petition was denied. However, the WCAB reversed that decision on appeal based on the employee’s testimony that she had not applied for work for two years because it was very depressing. On appeal, the Commonwealth Court disagreed with the WCAB. It found that the employer did not meet its initial burden of proving that the employee had voluntarily retired for purposes of the PA Work Comp Act.  She had testified that she did not accept a retirement pension and did not refuse suitable work. Accordingly, suspension was not warranted

The workers’ comp  attorneys at Liever, Hyman & Potter, P.C., handle cases just like this as a regular part of our practice in Berks County and Schuylkill County, PA.

Posted in Workers' Compensation | Comments Off
← Older posts
  • Archives

    • January 2012
    • December 2011
    • November 2011
    • October 2011
    • September 2011
    • August 2011
    • June 2011
    • May 2011
    • April 2011
    • March 2011
    • February 2011
    • January 2011
    • November 2010
    • October 2010
    • September 2010
    • August 2010
    • July 2010
    • June 2010
    • May 2010
    • April 2010
    • March 2010
    • December 2009
    • October 2009
    • September 2009
    • August 2009
    • May 2009
    • April 2009
    • March 2009
    • February 2009
    • January 2009
    • December 2008
    • November 2008
    • October 2008
    • September 2008
  • Meta

    • Log in
Home | How it Works | Experience | Awards & Settlements | Auto Accident FAQs | Practice Areas | Blog | Contact Us
Lawyers PA | Medical Malpractice PA | Car Accident Lawyers PA | Workers' Compensation PA | Disclaimer | Site Map
last_line
Copyright 2011 Liever, Hyman & Potter, P.C. All Rights Reserved