Liever Hyman Potter
X

WE FIGHT
TO WIN

The attorneys of Liever Hyman Potter

AUTO ACCIDENT ATTORNEYS, PERSONAL INJURY & MALPRACTICE LAWYERS

Since our founding in 1959, we have won thousands of awards and settlements for victims and their families, including million-$ and multi-million-$ settlements.

E-MAIL    |    TEL    610 370 6682    /    570 794 5017    

Our litigation team obtained a settlement with
a lifetime payout of over $12,750,000 for a middle
aged woman who was diagnosed with a brain
arteriovenous malformation.   read more

A $1,280,000 settlement has been reached in
favor of a retired man seriously injured in an
auto accident at a city intersection.   read more

The insurer for the driver of a truck that swerved to
avoid rear-ending a school bus and collided with
another vehicle has paid 1.2 million for the serious
injuries suffered by the other driver.   read more

A daycare center accident that blinded one eye
of a 22-month old child and that “could have and
should have been prevented,” has been settled...
read more

A woman who was seriously injured when her
vehicle was struck by a drunken driver has won
a settlement of 2.5 million.   read more

Auto/Truck/Motorcycle Accidents; Personal Injury; Medical Malpractice; Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect; Workers' Compensation; Products Liability
Medical Malpractice; Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect; Auto/Truck/Motorcycle Accidents; Personal Injury; Workers' Compensation; Products Liability
Auto/Truck/Motorcycle Accidents; Personal Injury; Medical Malpractice; Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect; Workers' Compensation; Products Liability
Workers' Compensation; Auto/Truck/Motorcycle Accidents; Personal Injury; Medical Malpractice; Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect; Products Liability
Workers' Compensation; Auto/Truck/Motorcycle Accidents; Personal Injury; Medical Malpractice; Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect; Products Liability
Auto/Truck/Motorcycle Accidents; Personal Injury; Medical Malpractice; Nursing Home Abuse & Neglect; Workers' Compensation; Products Liability

Lack of Job Offers After Injured Worker Applies for Jobs Listed in Labor Market Survey Not a Defense to Reduction of Workers’ Compensation Benefits

August 16, 2010 by admin

The workers’ compensation lawyers at Liever, Hyman & Potter, P.C. serve Reading, Berks County, PA and Schuylkill County, PA.

The Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania issued an important decision on June 30, 2010 for workers’ compensation claimants. In Phoenixville Hospital v. WCAB (Shoap), 2188 C.D. 2009 (Pa.Cmwlth. 2010), the Commonwealth Court held that, when an employer requests a reduction of workers’ compensation benefits using an estimate of the Claimant’s earnings based on a labor market survey, the fact that the Claimant applied for the jobs listed in the labor market survey, and did not receive any job offers, was not a defense to a reduction of benefits.

In that case, the Employer filed a Petition to reduce the Claimant’s workers’ compensation benefits using an estimate of earnings based on a labor market survey completed by a vocational expert, which listed five (5) jobs which were open and available and within the Claimant’s capabilities as established by the insurance company doctor. The Claimant applied for each of the positions a month or more after they were identified as open and available, and did not receive any job offers. The Workers’ Compensation Judge denied the Employer’s request to reduce the Claimant’s benefits, because she applied for the jobs listed in the labor market survey in good faith, but did not receive any job offers. The Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board upheld that decision.

On appeal, the Commonwealth Court stated that, under the Pennsylvania Workers’ Compensation Act, the Employer was entitled to a reduction of benefits based on evidence of Claimant’s earning power proved through expert testimony alone (i.e. a labor market survey), rather than evidence that the Claimant had obtained actual employment. The Court went on to hold that, since the Workers’ Compensation Judge in the case had accepted the testimony of the Employer’s vocational expert that the jobs listed in the labor market survey where actually open and available to the Claimant at the time the survey was completed, the fact that the Claimant applied for the jobs weeks later, and did not receive any job offers, was immaterial. The Commonwealth Court also noted that the Claimant had an obligation to pursue employment opportunities upon receipt of the Notice of Ability to Return to Work and before receiving any earning power assessments or labor market surveys.

The Commonwealth Court, accordingly, reversed the prior decision, and reduced the Claimant’s workers’ compensation benefits.

By Andrew F. Fick, Esquire


SERVING VICTIMS OF:
MOTOR VEHICLE INJURY
CAR ACCIDENTS
TRUCK ACCIDENTS
MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENTS
DRUNK DRIVERS
SLIP AND FALLS
WORKERS' COMPENSATION
OCCUPATIONAL DISEASE
UNSAFE PRODUCTS/CONDITIONS
WORK INJURIES
WRONGFUL DEATH
INADEQUATE WORKERS COMP.
MEDICAL MALPRACTICE
DOCTOR/HOSPITAL ERRORS
SURGERY ERRORS
OPERATING ROOM MISTAKES
PREGNANCY & BIRTH INJURIES
MISDIAGNOSIS
FAILURE TO DIAGNOSE
PRESCRIPTION ERRORS
FAILURE TO DIAGNOSE CANCER
NURSING HOME NEGLECT
NURSING HOME ABUSE
BED SORES